Aurora Solar Blog
Aurora Solar Blog

Solar design tips, sales advice, and industry insights from the premiere solar design software platform

David leads the modeling and computational efforts that underlie Aurora’s PV performance simulation engine. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees, all from Carnegie Mellon University.


Our Newsletter

Subscribe to our updates and never miss out on new features or industry insights.

Aurora Solar Blog

Choosing the Right Size Inverter for Your Solar Design: A Primer on Inverter Clipping

David BrombergDavid Bromberg

As you likely know, solar cells produce direct current (DC) electricity, which is typically converted to alternating current (AC) electricity by an inverter. Converting energy from DC to AC allows you to deliver it to the grid, or use it to power buildings (both of which operate with AC electricity). When designing a solar installation, and selecting the inverter, we must consider how much DC power will be produced by the solar array and how much AC power the inverter is able to output (its power rating).

In this post, we’ll discuss some important considerations for solar projects to ensure that the inverters in your designs are appropriately sized. Specifically, we’ll examine the relationship between the amount of energy your solar array produces and the amount of power your inverter can output, and we’ll introduce the concept of inverter clipping.

Understanding the DC-to-AC Ratio
It often makes sense to oversize a solar array, such that the installed DC capacity exceeds the AC power rating of the inverter. This allows for a greater energy harvest when production is below the inverter’s rating, which it typically is for most of the day.

Consider the graph of energy production as a function of time of day in Figure 1. The yellow line shows a typical bell curve of AC output power peaking at noon, just below the rating of the inverter indicated by the dashed line. If we increase the size of the solar array, thereby increasing the DC-to-AC ratio of the system (black curve), we can harvest more AC energy throughout the day. The area between the yellow and black curves is the energy that is gained by increasing the DC-to-AC ratio.

graph of inverter output over time, illustrating power limiting

Figure 1: Inverter AC output over the course of a day for a system with a low DC-to-AC ratio (yellow curve) and high DC-to-AC ratio (black curve).

Inverter Clipping
While oversizing the solar array relative to the inverter’s rating can help your system capture more energy throughout the day, this approach is not without costs. What Figure 1 also shows is an effect called inverter clipping, sometimes referred to as power limiting. When the DC maximum power point (MPP) of the solar array – or the point at which the solar array is generating the most amount of energy – is greater than the inverter’s power rating, the “extra” power generated by the array is “clipped.” This leads to a flatline in the black curve during peak production hours. The inverter effectively prevents the system from reaching its MPP, capping the power at the inverter’s nameplate power rating.

Modeling inverter clipping is crucial to properly design a system with a DC-to-AC ratio greater than 1, or in regions that frequently see an irradiance larger than the standard test conditions (STC) irradiance of 1000 W/m2 (because higher levels of irradiance lead to higher MPP). Consider a south-facing, 20°-tilt ground mount system in North Carolina (35.37° latitude) with a 100 kW central inverter. If we design the system with a DC-to-AC ratio of 1, it will never clip; however, we will also not fully utilize the AC capacity of the inverter.

If we want a larger system size we could place another 100 kW block (a section of solar panels connected to an inverter), or we can pack more DC power generation onto our first inverter. The latter allows us to save cost by not purchasing another inverter, and, like we saw in Figure 1, we can harvest more energy during off-peak hours. Depending on the chosen DC-to-AC ratio, we will also sacrifice some amount of energy to inverter clipping.

Table 1 summarizes energy production results for three DC-to-AC ratios, as well as how much energy is clipped. If a simulation tool does not properly model clipping, the designer may be led to believe that, for example, the 100 kW inverter can fully handle the DC-to-AC ratio of 1.5 and output 228.24 MWh, whereas in reality 11.0 MWh would be lost to clipping. This could lead to a system that underperforms relative to the expected result. Knowing how much energy is clipped allows a designer to make an informed decision on how much DC to pack onto the inverter, and how effective the oversizing scheme is at increasing energy harvest.

Table 1: Annual energy production out of a 100 kW inverter as a function of DC-to-AC ratio. As the DC-to-AC ratio increases, so does the AC output and clipped energy.

DC-to-AC Ratio Annual AC Energy Production Energy Lost to Clipping
1.0 163.06 MWh 0.0 MWh
1.3 193.86 MWh 1.8 MWh (0.9%)
1.5 217.24 MWh 11.0 MWh (4.8%)

Aurora automatically takes inverter clipping into account in its performance simulations. The amount of energy that is clipped throughout the year, and the percentage of total energy that amount represents, is presented to the user as a simulation warning and in our system loss diagram. Combined with Aurora’s NEC validation report, which ensures designs do not violate any electrical or mechanical constraints or rules of the National Electric Code (NEC), and simulation checks on string voltage, this feature allows users to be confident that the systems they design are appropriately-sized and code-compliant.

Key Takeaways
• Oversizing a solar array relative to an inverter’s rating (DC-to-AC ratio greater than one) allows for increased energy harvest throughout most of the day, especially in the morning and later afternoon.
• When a DC array produces more energy than the inverter is rated to handle, the inverter clips the excess power and caps its output at its rated power.
• When estimating the energy production of a solar project design, it’s important that your performance simulations take inverter clipping into account (as Aurora does automatically), in order to ensure production results accurately reflect the system size of the design.

Do you have experience with inverter clipping in your solar project designs? Join the conversation on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn with the hashtag #SolarInverterClipping and share your insights!

Want to be in the loop on our latest articles? Click here to subscribe to our blog!

David leads the modeling and computational efforts that underlie Aurora’s PV performance simulation engine. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees, all from Carnegie Mellon University.